Himglish and Femalese: Why Women Don't Get Why Men Don't Get Them is a relationship book for everyone who's over relationship books: a fresh new guide to lead you through the perplexing questions of what it means to be a man or a woman and to live with men and women in the twenty-first century.

2482104043_bd39d04911_m(2)

Jean Hannah Edelstein is a relationship expert for the post-Sex and the City era: combining New York sass with British wit, Jean draws equally on experiential and anecdotal evidence, as well as the latest scientific studies, to deliver a witty, edgy and definitive manual - dare we also say womanual? - to understanding your partner/husband/wife/ boyfriend/girlfriend and any permutations thereof.

Himglish and Femalese is available in good bookshops in the UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa (and soon also to be found in translation in Slovenia). Check back here daily for Jean's erudite observations, thoughts on hot topics in the news, and answers to your pressing questions. Or other people's pressing questions. Or pressing questions that you ask under an assumed name because you think they're too embarrassing.

Write to Jean! You know you want to. jean@himglishandfemalese.com



H&F screen shot

Watch Himglish and Femalese on Vimeo.


Follow Himglish and Femalese on Twitter

Be a fan of Himglish and Femalese on Facebook

Subscribe to Himglish and Femalese by email

Send Jean your stories of Himglish and Femalese!

Read Jean's personal blog
August 18
Permalink

Women: do you have a man? If you do, better beware. Chances are that some lone female has her eye on him.

A new study provides evidence for what many have long suspected: that single women are much keener on pursuing a man who’s already taken than a singleton.

It’s true: all the taken men are best

Well. WELL. Here’s an interesting, revealing new study: remember all of those times you met some guy and thought, ‘meh,’ and then found out that he had a girlfriend and suddenly thought, ‘well, actually, maybe he is rather lovely’. You were not alone! Much as I would like to be a bastion of good behaviour, I must admit that I, too, have spent my fair share of time a) yearning for men in relationships to love ME instead of their partners (albeit not actively trying to extract them from said relationships, I feel I must note) and b) meeting perfectly lovely available men and thinking, ‘well, there’s got to be something inherently wrong with him, because otherwise he is so perfectly lovely that he should have a girlfriend.’

Not the way forward, my dears. Not the way forward.

So, how can we make this news we can use? When you find yourself in paroxysms of longing over men who are unavailable, perhaps you might find it helpful to reflect on the following tale from my youth (I know, but bear with me):

When I was three years old, I went to nursery in a somewhat fancy area where my classmates’ parents would get quite competitive about buying their progeny branded toys, which said progeny then brought in to school to display proudly to the class, which then (of course) sent the rest of us in to fits of jealousy.

So. For Christmas in 1985, my very fondest wish was for a CareBear (tm). And not just any CareBear (tm): I wanted Rainbow Bear (tm), who was pink and had a rainbow sewed on her stomach.  But having spied the price tag – something like thirty 1985 dollars – Mumelstein promptly decided that she was having none of that. Being plucky and creative, she bought a knock-off CareBear (totallynottm) and a rainbow patch, sewed them together, and presented it to me in my Christmas pillowcase. My reaction? ‘It doesn’t have a white tummy,’ I pouted, able to spot fake branded products before I was old enough to read. ‘That’s because Mrs Claus made it especially for you,’ Mumelstein countered.

I was sceptical. But I took it to nursery. And by the end of the day, several mothers had approached Mumelstein because their kids were now begging them for a special CareBear (totallynottm) just like mine, because the ones that they had were now crap in comparison to what I had.

Which was pretty preposterous. Much as is fancying a man because he is already in a relationship.

 
Comments (View)
blog comments powered by Disqus